SCOTT LINCICOME, an International trade attorney, published author, political adviser and frustrated libertarian had this assessment of the current state of the dispute between the US and Mexico over the illegal ban on Mexican trucks.
Quoting an article from “INSIDE TRADE”, a subscription industry publication:
In an interview with Inside U.S. Trade, a top Mexican trade official said late last week that Mexico will continue to impose retaliatory duties on U.S. exports to its market until a dispute over access for Mexican trucking services to the U.S. market is resolved. The official added that a resolution likely must do more than reinstate a limited pilot program that was gutted by the U.S. Congress last year….
“The [Mexican retaliatory] measures are there, and they will be there until this [trucking dispute] is resolved,” [Mexican Under Secretary for Trade Beatriz Leycegui] said in the interview.
She signaled that a resolution has to do more than simply revive the trucking pilot program, which provided for only limited access for Mexican trucks. The two sides “have to work on something that provides us greater certainty than what we had in the past,” she added, referring to the pilot program….
Leycegui declined to comment directly on whether Mexico could lift its retaliation even if the U.S. offers something less than the full market access for trucking services to which the U.S. agreed under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
According to Leycegui, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk did not provide any proposal for a negotiated solution during his visit to Mexico last week, nor did he offer a concrete date by which the U.S. would get back to Mexico with a proposal, she said.
However, the U.S. will start consultations with Congress and private-sector stakeholders to discuss possible options “very soon,” and Mexico expects to have news from the U.S. government very soon as well, she said….
While Mexico retains the right to modify its retaliation list, Leycegui signaled that Mexico is not currently focused on this possibility. At this point, “we think it is prudent to wait until we see some sign from the U.S. in the following days and weeks,” she said….
Jim Hoffa, general president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters union, on Feb. 16 said that his organization would work to keep the U.S. border closed to Mexican trucks. “We got the border closed to unsafe Mexican trucks and we’re keeping it closed. The Teamsters did that, nobody else did that — the Teamsters did that,” he said in a speech to local unions, according to a Feb. 16 press release issued by the Teamsters.
Hooray for Mexico. After 16 years of being treated as the proverbial red headed step-child, being lied to and treated as a less than equal participant in the tri-lateral NAFTA trade agreement, they’re standing their ground on this matter. As they should.
Scott goes on to opine:
If that’s really the case and Mexico’s not just bluffing, those brutal tariffs aren’t going anywhere in 2010. And US exporters will continue to unfairly suffer so that the White House and congressional Democrats can ensure the election-year support of their powerful supporters, the US Teamsters.
So much for that White House plan to dramatically expand American exports, huh?
As I’ve said previously. In the coming days, as we listen to Todd Spencer and company at OOIDA and their radio talkers whine about Mexican trucks putting every American truckers job at risk, remember the tariff’s, which OOIDA and Hoffa alone are responsible for, in addition to their stooges in Congress, have cost American’s 10’s of thousands of jobs and our ag sector has lost a large share of the market to other countries.
The Pilot Program, and the more than 800 Mexican trucking companies grandfathered in under the 1982 moratorium, have not cost American drivers one red cent. This whole brouhaha has been over less than 200 trucks.